ZELT Logo

Trademark refused in Spain: the administrative appeal before the OEPM

By , lawyer. Updated on . Leer en español

If the Spanish Office refuses your trademark, you can file an administrative appeal («recurso de alzada») within one month of publication of the refusal in the BOPI (art. 122.1 of Act 39/2015 and the OEPM applicants manual). It is a mandatory step before going to court and, if it is not filed in time, the refusal becomes final.

What a refusal means

The refusal is the decision by which the OEPM closes the registration procedure at first instance. It must state, even if briefly, the reasons on which it is based (art. 22.1 LM), it is published in the BOPI (art. 22.3 LM) and it may be total or limited to some goods or services (art. 22.2 LM). By my own count from an 11-week sample of the BOPI, around 6,500 refusals are published each year; this is my estimate, not an official figure.

The refusal does not end the administrative route, and this appeal is a prior and mandatory step for reaching the courts, as the OEPM applicants manual points out. For applicants abroad the point to watch is the same as with office actions: time runs from publication in the BOPI, and the appeal must be filed in Spanish (art. 11.9 LM).

What can be argued

The appeal must attack the specific reasons of the decision. Article 22.1 LM allows the Office to give reasons «briefly», but even brief reasoning must refer to the signs and goods actually in conflict. So I first check that the decision starts from the right premises: which earlier mark it identifies, for which goods, and how it compared the signs.

  • Errors in comparing the signs, such as relying on a single element when the others are not negligible (OHIM v Shaker, C-334/05 P, paragraphs 41 and 42).
  • Errors in comparing the goods or services, or a failure to examine some of them.
  • Failure to assess submissions or evidence filed.
  • An alternative claim for partial registration, in case the appeal is not upheld in full.

Limiting or dividing on appeal

The applicant may limit the list of goods or services «at any time» (art. 23.1 LM), and division is possible during registration or appeal proceedings where it confines the conflict to one of the divisional applications (art. 24.2 LM). A voluntary limitation may attract the corresponding fee (art. 23.3 LM). Negotiation with the owner of the earlier mark also remains possible at this stage.

The appeal fee

Filing the appeal requires payment of a fee. It is only refunded if the appeal is upheld in full on legal grounds attributable to the Office, and the refund must be requested when filing (art. 27.2 LM).

What happens next

The Office has a maximum of three months to issue and notify its decision; after that, the appeal may be deemed dismissed (art. 122.2 of Act 39/2015). Once the appeal has been decided, the route to the administrative courts is open (art. 28.4 LM), with a two-month period from an express decision (art. 46.1 LJCA).

I work on fixed rates by process: each procedure has a closed fee, which you know before instructing me, with no hourly billing. Official fees, where they apply, are separate.

Frequently asked questions

How long do I have to appeal a refusal in Spain?

One month from publication of the refusal in the BOPI. After that, the decision is final.

Can I appeal if I did not respond to the office action?

Yes. Not having responded does not prevent an appeal, although some tools will have been lost, such as the request for proof of use within the office action period.

Can I limit the goods on appeal?

Yes. Article 23.1 of the Trade Marks Act allows limitation at any time, and article 24.2 allows division during an appeal.

Do you have a case open in Spain?

Tell me about it and I will tell you what I see and what deadline you have. I work on fixed rates by process: each procedure has a closed fee, which you know before instructing me.

This article provides general information and is no substitute for advice on a specific case. Always check the deadline in your own file. Only the Spanish and official texts of the legislation are authoritative; English renderings of Spanish provisions are my own.